FAQ/effectSize - CBU statistics Wiki

Revision 45 as of 2009-01-27 16:46:03

Clear message
location: FAQ / effectSize

Rules of thumb on magnitudes of effect sizes

Taken from Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. An overview of commonly used effect sizes in psychology is given by Vacha-Haase and Thompson (2004).

Effect Size

Use

Small

Medium

Large

Correlation

0.1

0.3

0.5

$$\eta^text{2}$$

one-way anova (regression)

0.01

0.06

0.14

Cohen's f

one-way anova (regression)

0.10

0.25

0.40

$$\eta^text{2}$$

Multiple regression

0.02

0.13

0.26

Cohen's f

Multiple Regression

0.14

0.39

0.59

Cohen's d

t-tests

0.2

0.5

0.8

Cohen's $$\omega$$

chi-square

0.1

0.3

0.5

Odds Ratios

2 by 2 tables

1.5

3.5

9.0

Also:Haddock et al (1998) state that $$\sqrt{3/\pi}$$ multiplied by the log of the odds ratio is a standardised difference equivalent to Cohen's d.

Definitions

$$\mbox{Cohen's d} = \frac{\mbox{difference between a pair of group means}}{\mbox{averaged group standard deviation}}$$

$$\eta^text{2} = \frac{\mbox{ SS(effect)} }{\mbox{Sum of SS(effects having the same error term as effect of interest) + SS(the error associated with these effects)} $$

$$\mbox{Cohen's f} = \sqrt{\frac{\etatext{2} }{1 - \etatext{2}} }$$

There is also a $$\mbox{Partial } \eta^text{2} = \frac{\mbox{ SS(effect)} }{\mbox{SS(effect) + SS(error for that effect)} $$

Suggestion : Use the square of a pearson correlation for effect sizes for partial $$\etatext{2}$$ giving 0.01 (small), 0.09 (medium) and 0.25 (large) giving intuitively larger values than $$\etatext{2}$$.

$$\omega = \sqrt{ \sum_text{1}text{no. groups} \frac{\mbox{(observed proportion - expected proportion)}text{2}}{ \mbox{ expected proportion}}}$$

* [wiki:FAQ/oddsr Odds Ratio definition]

References

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Haddock, CK, Rinkdskopf, D. & Shadish, C. (1998) Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues. Psychological Methods 3 339-353.

Tabachnick, BG and Fidell, LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Fifth Edition. Pearson Education:London.

Vacha-Haase, T and Thompson, B (2004) How to estimate and interpret various effect ssizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology 51(4) 473-481.