Diff for "FAQ/dunlap" - CBU statistics Wiki
location: Diff for "FAQ/dunlap"
Differences between revisions 19 and 20
Revision 19 as of 2007-08-23 15:44:06
Size: 2487
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Revision 20 as of 2007-08-23 15:44:54
Size: 2482
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 35: Line 35:
||||||||||<style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> Regression on p predictors ||  || Small:$$R^text{2}$$=0.02 || Medium:$$R^text{2}$$=0.13 || Large: $$R^text{2}$$=0.26 || ||||||||||<style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> Regression on p predictors || Small:$$R^text{2}$$=0.02 || Medium:$$R^text{2}$$=0.13 || Large: $$R^text{2}$$=0.26 ||

A quick guide to choice of sample sizes for Cohen's effect sizes

Dunlap and Myers (1997) suggest rules of thumb for sample sizes using Cohen's effect size rules of thumb and equations that they have derived in some simple cases. These are given in the table. The sample sizes guarantee between 80% and 90% power to detect the given effect sizes.

Effect Size

Formula

Small

Medium

Large

Cohen's d unpaired t,

$$\frac{\mbox{16}}{\mbox{d}^text{2}}$$ + 2

0.2

0.5

0.8

equal group sizes

402

66

28

Correlation

8/$$r^text{2}$$

0.1

0.3

0.5

Total sample size

800

88

32

$$\phi$$, 2x2 table

8/$$\phi^text{2}$$

0.1

0.3

0.5

Total sample size

800

88

32

Dunlap and Myers (1997) show in their appendix that for a 2x2 table of proportions of form

Column 1

Column 2

Row 1

$$p_text{11}$$

$$p_text{12}$$

Row 2

$$p_text{21}$$

$$p_text{22}$$

with

A = $$\frac{p_text{11}}{p_text{11}+p_text{12}}$$, B = $$\frac{p_text{21}}{p_text{21}+p_text{22}}$$

C = $$\frac{p_text{11}}{p_text{11}+p_text{21}}$$, D = $$\frac{p_text{12}}{p_text{12}+p_text{22}}$$

then we can define $$\phi = \sqrt{\mbox{abs(A-B)} \mbox{abs(C-D)}}$$

In addition Maxwell (2000) mentions rules of thumb for power in a multiple regression with p predictors. These are give below:

Regression on p predictors

Small:$$R^text{2}$$=0.02

Medium:$$R^text{2}$$=0.13

Large: $$R^text{2}$$=0.26

Total sample size

80% Power

392+p

52+p

22+p

Total sample size

90% Power

526+p

70+p

30+p

Reference

Dunlap WP, Myers L. (1997) Approximating power for significance tests with one degree of freedom. Psychological methods 2(2) 186-191.

Maxwell SE (2000) Sample size and multiple regression analysis, Psychological methods 5(4) 434-458.

None: FAQ/dunlap (last edited 2013-03-08 10:17:35 by localhost)