Diff for "GroupFeedback" - Methods
location: Diff for "GroupFeedback"
Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2008-04-02 23:10:03
Size: 2195
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2008-04-02 23:17:46
Size: 2575
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 39: Line 39:
== Emotion (A few comments from PhilBarnard by email; no meeting with the group to date) == == Emotion (A few comments from PhilBarnard and AndyCalder by email; no meeting with the group to date) ==

 AC: One thing I'd discussed with members of E1 was being able to
identify non-linear functions in SPM (e.g., a non-linear modulation
of a particular contrast with personality dimension). I mentioned
this briefly to Matthew and he thought it was possible.

 PB: Another longer term research issue discussed in the past with Ian was
PCA's over time???

Feedback from Research Groups in February 2008

Memory and Knowledge (13 February 2008)

  1. Sensitivity artefacts in MRI

    • Combined spin echo and gradient echo images does not yield improvements in areas subject to sensitivity artefacts. Request for a tool to provide parameters for a sequence optimized for imaging a specific area.
  2. Source control for software development

  3. Imaging with patients

    • Advice on best practice in co-registration of brains with lesions: relative merits of manual masking of areas of lesion versus SPM5's default method.

  4. Query about coregistration with MEG, and the use of MRI of lesioned brains to constrain MEG source solutions. Highlighing difficulty for SPM or MNE if there is a lesioned area on the cortical surface.

    • Action: None at present as MEG is outside the Methods Group's current range of expertise.

  5. Methods Group's role in MEG development

    • Action: None at present as MEG is outside the Methods Group's current range of expertise. However noted that OlafHauk and OlegKorzyukov are active in expanding CBU expertise in this field, and we will look into case for expanding resources in this direction. Methods Group meetings will continue to provide a forum for sharing of experience and developing understanding.

Attention (19 February 2008)

  1. ISSS sequence required for a number of studies (with Tristan and Matt)

    • To present words in quiet;
    • To get multiple information on the timecourse of the hrf (especially with patients);

    • Study on semantic ambiguity in subjects in vegetative state.
    If ISSS cannot be implemented by CS within a short timescale should someone be hired in to do the work?

Language (26 February 2008)

Emotion (A few comments from PhilBarnard and AndyCalder by email; no meeting with the group to date)

  • AC: One thing I'd discussed with members of E1 was being able to

identify non-linear functions in SPM (e.g., a non-linear modulation of a particular contrast with personality dimension). I mentioned this briefly to Matthew and he thought it was possible.

  • PB: Another longer term research issue discussed in the past with Ian was

PCA's over time???

None: GroupFeedback (last edited 2013-03-08 10:28:25 by localhost)