Diff for "DiffusionMeeting10May2007" - MRC CBU Imaging Wiki
location: Diff for "DiffusionMeeting10May2007"
Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2007-05-10 16:10:35
Size: 424
Editor: pc0179
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2007-05-10 16:34:02
Size: 2259
Editor: devel06
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Notes from informal meeting about diffusion =
Line 2: Line 3:
Acqisition
Optimization for fibre tracking
? Number of averages vs number of directions
Isotropic vs defined diffusion angles - relating to anatomy
Cardiac gating; expected differences
On 10 May 2007
Line 8: Line 5:
CBU
Default 63 angles, 2 averages, 14 minutes
Alternatively 30 directions 3 or 4 averages
== Acqisition issues ==
Line 12: Line 7:
WBIC
8 minutes
2mm isotropic
63 directions
=== Need for optimization for fibre tracking ===
Line 17: Line 9:
12 direction
5 B values for estimation of diffusion coefficent - Guy Williams + AC
Issues are:

 * Number of averages vs number of directions
 * Isotropic vs defined diffusion angles - relating to anatomy
 * Cardiac gating; expected differences; whether this can be easily applied using Siemens setup. Is currently working for Oxford with Siemens patches - these may not be available to us

=== CBU acquisitions ===

 * Default is 63 angles, 2 averages, 14 minutes
 * Alternative 30 directions 3 or 4 averages

Need to investigate which is preferable for fibre tracking

=== WBIC ===

For fibre tracking:
 * 8 minutes, 2mm isotropic, 63 directions - ? one average (as it were)

For traumatic brain injury patients (Virginia Newcombe):
 * 12 direction, 5 B values (allowing more accurate estimation of diffusion coefficent)
 * Physicists involved are Guy Williams + Adrian Carpenter

== Analysis ==

CBU currently using FSL - see FdtDiffusionNotes
BrainVisa set up, but display not working due to OpenGL problems. Needs local (desktop) install

WBIC using dtiquery - http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/dti/dti-query/ good display routines, fibre tracking - algorithm? Have also used FSL - particularly for fibre track cross subject analysis using TBSS program.

== Open questions ==

How to do quantitative cross-subject analysis or fibre track anatomy in relationship to neuropsychology? Investigation of TBSS? Using FSL fibre tracking for statistical analysis across subjects of connectivity between areas

== Plan ==

Hope to set up more knowledge sharing between WBIC and CBU / CSL. Maybe Wiki pages for WBIC on diffusion experience and software.

First step at understanding cross-subject analyses? Suggest journal club on TBSS main paper.

S.M. Smith, H. Johansen-Berg, M. Jenkinson, D. Rueckert, T.E. Nichols, K.L. Miller, M.D. Robson, D.K. Jones, J.C. Klein, A.J. Bartsch, and T.E.J. Behrens. Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Nature Protocols, 2(3):499-503, 2007. Technical report: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/research/tbss/tr05ss1.pdf


MatthewBrett

Notes from informal meeting about diffusion

On 10 May 2007

Acqisition issues

Need for optimization for fibre tracking

Issues are:

  • Number of averages vs number of directions
  • Isotropic vs defined diffusion angles - relating to anatomy
  • Cardiac gating; expected differences; whether this can be easily applied using Siemens setup. Is currently working for Oxford with Siemens patches - these may not be available to us

CBU acquisitions

  • Default is 63 angles, 2 averages, 14 minutes
  • Alternative 30 directions 3 or 4 averages

Need to investigate which is preferable for fibre tracking

WBIC

For fibre tracking:

  • 8 minutes, 2mm isotropic, 63 directions - ? one average (as it were)

For traumatic brain injury patients (Virginia Newcombe):

  • 12 direction, 5 B values (allowing more accurate estimation of diffusion coefficent)
  • Physicists involved are Guy Williams + Adrian Carpenter

Analysis

CBU currently using FSL - see FdtDiffusionNotes BrainVisa set up, but display not working due to OpenGL problems. Needs local (desktop) install

WBIC using dtiquery - http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/dti/dti-query/ good display routines, fibre tracking - algorithm? Have also used FSL - particularly for fibre track cross subject analysis using TBSS program.

Open questions

How to do quantitative cross-subject analysis or fibre track anatomy in relationship to neuropsychology? Investigation of TBSS? Using FSL fibre tracking for statistical analysis across subjects of connectivity between areas

Plan

Hope to set up more knowledge sharing between WBIC and CBU / CSL. Maybe Wiki pages for WBIC on diffusion experience and software.

First step at understanding cross-subject analyses? Suggest journal club on TBSS main paper.

S.M. Smith, H. Johansen-Berg, M. Jenkinson, D. Rueckert, T.E. Nichols, K.L. Miller, M.D. Robson, D.K. Jones, J.C. Klein, A.J. Bartsch, and T.E.J. Behrens. Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Nature Protocols, 2(3):499-503, 2007. Technical report: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/research/tbss/tr05ss1.pdf

MatthewBrett

CbuImaging: DiffusionMeeting10May2007 (last edited 2013-03-07 21:22:57 by localhost)